The appeal of 10 men convicted of the murder of Thackoor Boodram, brother of drug kingpin Dole Chadee, took yet another turn yesterday after it was alleged that they had coerced the State’s main witness into recanting his evidence.
The allegation, made by Junior Grandison in an unsigned statement to the police in 2013, was raised for the first time yesterday as State prosecutors responded to the appeal of the men who are serving life sentences for murdering Boodram in 1997.
Grandison has refused to testify before the Appeal Court, so prosecutors brought a Roman Catholic priest and two senior police officer who interacted with him before and after he gave the statutory declaration on the group’s behalf in 2011.
Father Allan Ventour testified that Grandison visited him at Mt St Benedict to confess to fabricating the case against the group in 2011. While Ventour admitted that he could not recall the exact date of the meeting, he remembered that Grandison confessed to lying during the trial.
Retired Assistant Commissioner of Police (ACP) David Nedd told the court he worked on Boodram’s murder investigation and was contacted by Grandison in 2013.
Nedd, who was then retired, referred Grandison to the Anti-Corruption Investigations Bureau (ACIB), which was assigned to investigate the circumstances of his recanted evidence.
He claimed that Grandison gave him a cellphone and charger on which he claimed had messages from the convicted men, asking that he give the declaration.
However, when he was cross-examined by the group’s lawyer, Edward Fitzgerald, QC, Nedd could not say why the ACIB did not have records of receiving the phone. He was also asked whether he recognised Grandison’s voice in a series of recorded telephone conversations with accused Michael “Rat” Maharaj earlier this year.
Fitzgerald pointed out that both men were using their aliases and discussing details of Boodram’s murder and trial but Nedd said he could not be sure of their identities as many of the details were public knowledge.
Last to testify was ACIB investigator, acting Senior Supt John Frederick. He said after Grandison was handed over by Nedd, he agreed to provide a statement in which he alleged that he was coerced into giving the declaration.
Frederick said Grandison refused to sign the statement as he said he did not trust the police because they failed to deliver on promises made to him for his testimony in the trial, including making a 30 per cent deposit on a Housing Development Corporation (HDC) house.
In his final submissions, Fitzgerald said his client’s convictions should be overturned as the varying claims by Grandison showed that he was an unreliable witness.
Describing him as a “notorious liar”, Fitzgerald said: “He says anything that suits him at the time. He accuses everybody of everything.”
State prosecutor Travers Sinanan is expected to make his final submissions this morning.
